Excellent:
1. Demonstrates an accurate and thorough depiction of the event selected. This event is based on something mentioned in the film.
2. Intelligently uses images, video, and audio to enhance our understanding of the event researched.
3. Provides accurate, insightful, and cited research to support the explanation.
4. Contains all the elements of the assignment.
5. All group members were utilized.
Good:
1. Demonstrates an accurate, but less than thorough depiction of the event selected. While there is useful information provided, the page isn’t as thorough or as thoughtful as it could be. This may be the result of basing the event on something outside of the film or doing limited research.
2. Uses images, video, and audio in some way to enhance our understanding of the event. Use of these technologies may not be consistently insightful.
3. Provides accurate, somewhat insightful, and cited research to support the explanation.
4. Contains all the elements of the assignment.
5. All group members were utilized.
Competent:
1. Demonstrates a slightly accurate, minimal depiction of the event selected. Information is provided, but that information may be slight and not applicable to the film.
2. Uses some images or video or audio, but it may not consistently provide any kind of insight or enhance our understanding of the event. In many ways, it’s simply image-just-for-image-sake, video-just-for-video-sake, and/or audio-just-for-audio-sake
3. Research is either minimal, lacks any kind of insight into the event, or is somewhat inaccurate.
4. Missing some elements of the assignment.
5. All group members were utilized, although some may have done more than others.
Incomplete:
1. Depiction of event is basically inaccurate and/or extremely brief in its explanation of the event.
2. Uses very little, if any, video, audio, or imagery. Or, the technology used is irrelevant and meaningless.
3. Little, if any, research is done or cited. There’s a sense that many things are just made up or provided without much thought regarding the source.
4. Missing elements of the assignment.
5. Members of the group are left out or don’t contribute.
Criteria for Success
Excellent:
1. Demonstrates an accurate and thorough depiction of the event selected. This event is based on something mentioned in the film.
2. Intelligently uses images, video, and audio to enhance our understanding of the event researched.
3. Provides accurate, insightful, and cited research to support the explanation.
4. Contains all the elements of the assignment.
5. All group members were utilized.
Good:
1. Demonstrates an accurate, but less than thorough depiction of the event selected. While there is useful information provided, the page isn’t as thorough or as thoughtful as it could be. This may be the result of basing the event on something outside of the film or doing limited research.
2. Uses images, video, and audio in some way to enhance our understanding of the event. Use of these technologies may not be consistently insightful.
3. Provides accurate, somewhat insightful, and cited research to support the explanation.
4. Contains all the elements of the assignment.
5. All group members were utilized.
Competent:
1. Demonstrates a slightly accurate, minimal depiction of the event selected. Information is provided, but that information may be slight and not applicable to the film.
2. Uses some images or video or audio, but it may not consistently provide any kind of insight or enhance our understanding of the event. In many ways, it’s simply image-just-for-image-sake, video-just-for-video-sake, and/or audio-just-for-audio-sake
3. Research is either minimal, lacks any kind of insight into the event, or is somewhat inaccurate.
4. Missing some elements of the assignment.
5. All group members were utilized, although some may have done more than others.
Incomplete:
1. Depiction of event is basically inaccurate and/or extremely brief in its explanation of the event.
2. Uses very little, if any, video, audio, or imagery. Or, the technology used is irrelevant and meaningless.
3. Little, if any, research is done or cited. There’s a sense that many things are just made up or provided without much thought regarding the source.
4. Missing elements of the assignment.
5. Members of the group are left out or don’t contribute.